Skip to main content

Billionaires

 Billionaires            Gerry OShea

Elon Musk rattled the American political system recently. The leaders of the political parties in Washington settled on a budget deal that would avert the looming end-of-year government shutdown. This negotiated agreement was worked out by the leaders of both parties in the House and Senate without objection from the incoming president, Donald Trump, or his advisers.

 The compromise bill would have the needed support in both Houses, and President Biden said he would sign it. Then, a series of tweets by Mr. Musk berated the deal for failing to press home his version of the conservative agenda.

Amazingly, the Republican leaders folded immediately, and the bill died, leaving just a few days for the frustrated negotiators to devise an alternative to avoid a government shutdown over Christmas.

Historians could not identify even one occasion in the last 100 years when an outsider vetoed a budget decision with bipartisan approval in Washington.

Who is Mr. Musk who can exercise such control over the Republican Party? He is a South African businessman with major investments in the United States, including in electric vehicles and space exploration. His political clout emanates from his bank account. He is a mega-billionaire with a net worth in excess of 400 billion dollars, reputedly the richest man in the world.

He went all-in supporting Donald Trump in the recent presidential election, donating in the region of a staggering 250 million dollars – a quarter of a billion – to the Trump election coffers.

His politics favor far-right policies. Apart from his support for Trump, he is an open admirer of Nigel Farage and the far-right British Reform Party, which, according to reports, he plans to bolster with a 100 million dollar check in the near future.

More ominously, he has declared strong approval for the neo-Nazi-leaning AfD party in Germany. The expectation is that they, too, will get generous millions to enable them to move higher than their current rating of 18% in the polls. Elections to the Bundestag will be held during the last week of February 2025.

The Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which declared that political spending is a protected form of free speech, has opened the door for super-rich individuals to expand their power by designing and promoting media platforms like X, previously known as Twitter. This allows them to exert a significant influence on political and social developments.

Self-employed billionaires like Mr. Musk and Mr. Trump are part of a paradigm shift in social media in which their bulging bank accounts can increasingly convert financial capital into social capital.

Access to unfiltered social media platforms is grasped by egocentric billionaires who can now buy an outlet for their controversial ideas and decide who can use it. President-elect Trump’s lawyers will argue before the Supreme Court that his free speech rights are being eclipsed, depriving his 14.7 million followers from engaging with him on Tik-Tok.

 The Department of Justice claims that China and other hostile forces are using this platform to undermine United States interests, including spreading lies about America.

There is a vogue among the super-rich for misconstruing the First Amendment as permission to promote their particular vision for the future, including how free speech should work and who should benefit from it.

This unhinged strategy that focuses on increasing the power of very few tycoons presents a major challenge to the continuation of democracy in America and other Western countries.  

Almost a decade ago, Warren Buffett, a multiple billionaire, claimed that he paid a lower tax rate than his secretary, thanks to loopholes and deductions that benefit the wealthy.

His claim sparked a debate about the fairness of the tax system as middle-class taxpayers protested the unfairness of coddling the rich. This depressing statistic was made worse by President Trump’s massive tax break accruing to the wealthy since the 2019 budget.

Jack Bogdanski, a professor at Lewis and Clark Law School, has written trenchantly on how the tax system works for people at the top. “You have an army of well-trained, brilliant people who sit there all day long, charging a thousand dollars an hour, thinking up often-obtuse ways to beat the tax system” for their megarich clients.

Danie Hemel, a tax law professor at New York University explains that “the richest Americans are able to pass down approximately $200 billion each year without paying estate tax on it thanks to the use of complex trusts and other avoidance strategies.”

Billionaires have made a sport of trying to avoid the estate tax. Gary Cohn, a former Goldman Sachs executive and Donald Trump's chief economic adviser during his first term, quipped that “only morons pay the estate tax.”

Times were never better for billionaires. Not only do they have unspendable amounts of money, but they control social media platforms, reaching tens of millions every day. Unreal power!

Oxfam International’s executive director, Amitabh Behar, spoke recently about the plight of the millions of poor people and how they will fare amid all the affluence. His words are not encouraging. He points out that the five richest men in the world have doubled their fortunes from $405 billion to $869 billion since 2020 while five billion people were added to the ranks of the destitute in the same timeframe.

And wait for Mr. Behar’s prediction about the future – he expects the first trillionaire to emerge in the next ten years.

Gerry OShea blogs at wemustbetalking

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Election Reflections

  Election Reflections       Gerry OShea On a post-election day when I lived in Dublin, I recall meeting a local man who was very involved with one of the political parties in the previous day’s contest. I asked him for his views on the election. I still recall clearly his answer: “The election was fine but the f----ing voters turned on us, despite all we did for them.” This response will resonate with many Democrats as they reflect on the recent presidential election. After all, the health of the American economy is deemed by experts to be so strong that it claimed a cover-page headline in the prestigious Economist magazine, stating in bold letters that the United States economy is the envy of the world. They compared the employment statistics, wage increases, and growth of GDP with those of all the other major countries and found the United States ahead in these measurements. Add the good news of major gains in the stock market, which usually p...

Final Thoughts on the Election

  Final Thoughts on the Election        Gerry OShea A recent study examining party affiliation among adults in the United States revealed that the biggest slice of the electorate, 43%, define themselves as Independent, meaning they are not committed to either political party. According to the same report, Republicans and Democrats can each claim the solid allegiance of just 27% of voters. The uncommitted multitudes like to explain that they assess each election based on the policies presented by the various candidates. They boast that they cannot be taken for granted and are sometimes disdainful of those who vote based on party allegiance. An acquaintance of mine, Sean, a fellow Irishman and declared independent voter, long retired from the NYPD, who reads the Irish Echo every week and so is clear about my political preferences, approached me last week to confide his voting dilemma. He told me that he has no time for Harris and les...
  Trip to Honduras        Gerry OShea I recently returned from a four-day visit to San Pedro Sula, the second-largest city in Honduras. I was accompanied by Vincent Collins, his wife Linda, and Patricia Alarcon Cavalie. We were representing the New York-based charity HOPe, which has a project in the region of Choloma on the outskirts of the city. All of us, except Linda, are members of the organization. HOPe was founded in Yonkers by a group of Irish people in 1997, the 150 th anniversary of the worst year of the Irish potato famine. The members of this group, led by Pat Buckley from Killarney, felt that bemoaning the awful laissez-faire policies of the British Government, which caused the Irish disaster, was an inadequate response to the Gorta Mor tragedy.   We looked for other ways of honoring the lives of the million or more Irish people who died from starvation or related diseases in their family huts or on the streets, or in the coffin...