Skip to main content

The Irish Boundary Commission 1924

 

The Boundary Commission 1924        Gerry OShea

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a vibrant Irish Parliamentary Party represented Irish nationalist aspirations and demands in Westminster. Charles Parnell first provided able and strong leadership, and John Redmond took over at the helm after his demise.

The Third Home Rule Bill passed in 1913 was greeted by massive celebrations in Dublin. Finally, the country would have its own legislature for the first time since Grattan’s Parliament was prorogued in 1800, and that gathering excluded Catholics from serving.

Patrick Pearse, one of the leaders of the Republican Fenian tradition, welcomed Home Rule while warning presciently that if the British reneged on its implementation, there would be “hell to pay.”

A few months before the celebrations in Dublin, Sir Edward Carson, who, along with James Craig, provided the main leadership in the Loyalist community in Northern Ireland, spoke in Craigavon, outside Belfast, before more than 100,000 followers. He left no doubt about his community’s opinion on Home Rule: “the most nefarious conspiracy ever hatched against a free people.”

In response to Unionists' stern opposition to being ruled by any kind of Dublin legislature, the British parliament passed The Government of Ireland in 1920, creating a new parliament in Belfast with the right to pass laws for a bloc of six counties in the northeast. Significantly, no nationalist leader or Catholic prelate was even consulted about this legislation.

John Redmond asserted clearly that nationalists were unalterably opposed to any political division of the island: “The two-nations theory involves the mutilation of the Irish nation, and to us, that is an abomination and a blasphemy.”

When Michael Collins and Arthur Griffith led the Irish negotiating team to London in October 1921, the nascent six-county statelet already existed. However, the Irish negotiators still argued vainly for a united country.

The best they could achieve on this, the thorniest of all the issues they faced, was an agreement to set up a Boundary Commission which would “determine in accordance with the wishes of the inhabitants so far as may be compatible with economic and geographic conditions, the boundaries between Northern Ireland and the rest of Ireland.”

Collins, the most respected Republican in the delegation, was wildly off the mark in his assessment of the partition issue. He expected the Boundary Commission to slice off the North-Eastern counties of Tyrone and Fermanagh, as well as parts of Derry, Armagh and Down. This land area constituted almost half of the Northern Ireland territory governed by Stormont and would, in this wishful thinking, be ceded to the Free State.

Griffith joined him in imagining that the resulting much smaller territory would become non-viable, leading to a united government for the whole island within a dozen or so years. Lloyd George, known for good reason as the ‘Welsh Wizard,’ indicated to the Irish negotiators that this new Commission would recommend significant territorial changes that would benefit nationalists. He was simultaneously telling James Craig that he would have an effective veto on any proposed territorial alterations.

The Anglo-Irish Treaty was ratified in the Dail in early January 1922. Collins, especially, was very concerned about the savage nightly attacks on Catholics in Belfast and the vicinity of the city. In the summer of 1922, 232 people, nearly all Catholics, were killed in rioting in the north.

Craig and Collins tried to avoid a Boundary commission by working on proposals that they hoped would advance their mutual agendas. This was a great idea, except Craig’s ‘not an inch’ guiding principle doomed the effort.

The Treaty mandated that the Commission consist of three people: one appointed by each of the two governments in Dublin and Belfast and the third, who would act as chairman, appointed by the British Government.

Craig’s repeated declarations that he would not cede an inch of land, not to mind whole counties, was a serious embarrassment to the Dublin Government whose leaders had promised during the heated debates on the Treaty that the Boundary Commission would lead to significant transfer of territory to the south.

James Craig’s government reneged on its obligation to appoint one of the three commissioners. This decision required new legislation in Westminster and Dublin to allow the British prime minister to appoint someone to represent the Unionist position.

Josep Fisher, a distinguished barrister was chosen to represent Northern Ireland, and Justice Richard Feetham, a South African-based judge, was drafted in to chair the committee.

In July 1924, 100 years ago, the Free State government appointed the Minister for Education, Eoin MacNeill, as its Commissioner. The committee got down to dealing with its formal mandate on November 7th of that year. It was clear from an early stage that Feedham, supported by Fisher, wanted to maintain the border agreed in the Government of Ireland Act (1920) which created the six-county statelet.

Nationalists were gravely disappointed when the deliberations' results, which recommended no territorial change favoring the South, were leaked to the press in November 1925. In response to the angry reaction among nationalists all over the island, MacNeill resigned from the cabinet while challenging the content of the final report and making it clear that it did not have his approval.

The Boundary Report caused a full-blown crisis in the Free State. Prime Minister Cosgrave went to London to try to salvage something from the debris in a meeting with Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin. The effort failed completely. The Minister for External Affairs, Kevin O’Higgins, made a similar trip to Westminster. O'Higgins wanted to internationalize the crisis by involving the League of Nations, which was also rejected.

After failing to make any progress with the British authorities, Dublin called for the Boundary Commission report to be shelved. That was agreed on all sides, and it finally saw the light of day forty-four years later, in 1969.

Gerry OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Changing Ireland

  A Changing Ireland         Gerry OShea “ You talk to me of nationality, language, religion ,” Stephen Dedalus declared in Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. “I shall try to fly by those nets.” In response, one of his nationalist friends asked Stephen the bottom-line question “ Are you Irish at all?” According to the most recent Irish census that question is answered in the affirmative by no less than 23% of citizens who identify as non-white Irish. The number of Irish citizens born abroad, increased in 2022 and now accounts for 12% of the population. The biggest non-native groups come from Poland and the UK followed by India, Romania, Lithuania, and Brazil. In 2021, the year preceding the census, over 89,000 people moved to live in Ireland, with India and Brazil leading the way. How do the people feel about the big infusion of foreigners into the country? A 2020 Economic and Social Research Institute study revealed a gap between t...

Final Thoughts on the Election

  Final Thoughts on the Election        Gerry OShea A recent study examining party affiliation among adults in the United States revealed that the biggest slice of the electorate, 43%, define themselves as Independent, meaning they are not committed to either political party. According to the same report, Republicans and Democrats can each claim the solid allegiance of just 27% of voters. The uncommitted multitudes like to explain that they assess each election based on the policies presented by the various candidates. They boast that they cannot be taken for granted and are sometimes disdainful of those who vote based on party allegiance. An acquaintance of mine, Sean, a fellow Irishman and declared independent voter, long retired from the NYPD, who reads the Irish Echo every week and so is clear about my political preferences, approached me last week to confide his voting dilemma. He told me that he has no time for Harris and les...

Election Reflections

  Election Reflections       Gerry OShea On a post-election day when I lived in Dublin, I recall meeting a local man who was very involved with one of the political parties in the previous day’s contest. I asked him for his views on the election. I still recall clearly his answer: “The election was fine but the f----ing voters turned on us, despite all we did for them.” This response will resonate with many Democrats as they reflect on the recent presidential election. After all, the health of the American economy is deemed by experts to be so strong that it claimed a cover-page headline in the prestigious Economist magazine, stating in bold letters that the United States economy is the envy of the world. They compared the employment statistics, wage increases, and growth of GDP with those of all the other major countries and found the United States ahead in these measurements. Add the good news of major gains in the stock market, which usually p...