Skip to main content

The Irish Boundary Commission 1924

 

The Boundary Commission 1924        Gerry OShea

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a vibrant Irish Parliamentary Party represented Irish nationalist aspirations and demands in Westminster. Charles Parnell first provided able and strong leadership, and John Redmond took over at the helm after his demise.

The Third Home Rule Bill passed in 1913 was greeted by massive celebrations in Dublin. Finally, the country would have its own legislature for the first time since Grattan’s Parliament was prorogued in 1800, and that gathering excluded Catholics from serving.

Patrick Pearse, one of the leaders of the Republican Fenian tradition, welcomed Home Rule while warning presciently that if the British reneged on its implementation, there would be “hell to pay.”

A few months before the celebrations in Dublin, Sir Edward Carson, who, along with James Craig, provided the main leadership in the Loyalist community in Northern Ireland, spoke in Craigavon, outside Belfast, before more than 100,000 followers. He left no doubt about his community’s opinion on Home Rule: “the most nefarious conspiracy ever hatched against a free people.”

In response to Unionists' stern opposition to being ruled by any kind of Dublin legislature, the British parliament passed The Government of Ireland in 1920, creating a new parliament in Belfast with the right to pass laws for a bloc of six counties in the northeast. Significantly, no nationalist leader or Catholic prelate was even consulted about this legislation.

John Redmond asserted clearly that nationalists were unalterably opposed to any political division of the island: “The two-nations theory involves the mutilation of the Irish nation, and to us, that is an abomination and a blasphemy.”

When Michael Collins and Arthur Griffith led the Irish negotiating team to London in October 1921, the nascent six-county statelet already existed. However, the Irish negotiators still argued vainly for a united country.

The best they could achieve on this, the thorniest of all the issues they faced, was an agreement to set up a Boundary Commission which would “determine in accordance with the wishes of the inhabitants so far as may be compatible with economic and geographic conditions, the boundaries between Northern Ireland and the rest of Ireland.”

Collins, the most respected Republican in the delegation, was wildly off the mark in his assessment of the partition issue. He expected the Boundary Commission to slice off the North-Eastern counties of Tyrone and Fermanagh, as well as parts of Derry, Armagh and Down. This land area constituted almost half of the Northern Ireland territory governed by Stormont and would, in this wishful thinking, be ceded to the Free State.

Griffith joined him in imagining that the resulting much smaller territory would become non-viable, leading to a united government for the whole island within a dozen or so years. Lloyd George, known for good reason as the ‘Welsh Wizard,’ indicated to the Irish negotiators that this new Commission would recommend significant territorial changes that would benefit nationalists. He was simultaneously telling James Craig that he would have an effective veto on any proposed territorial alterations.

The Anglo-Irish Treaty was ratified in the Dail in early January 1922. Collins, especially, was very concerned about the savage nightly attacks on Catholics in Belfast and the vicinity of the city. In the summer of 1922, 232 people, nearly all Catholics, were killed in rioting in the north.

Craig and Collins tried to avoid a Boundary commission by working on proposals that they hoped would advance their mutual agendas. This was a great idea, except Craig’s ‘not an inch’ guiding principle doomed the effort.

The Treaty mandated that the Commission consist of three people: one appointed by each of the two governments in Dublin and Belfast and the third, who would act as chairman, appointed by the British Government.

Craig’s repeated declarations that he would not cede an inch of land, not to mind whole counties, was a serious embarrassment to the Dublin Government whose leaders had promised during the heated debates on the Treaty that the Boundary Commission would lead to significant transfer of territory to the south.

James Craig’s government reneged on its obligation to appoint one of the three commissioners. This decision required new legislation in Westminster and Dublin to allow the British prime minister to appoint someone to represent the Unionist position.

Josep Fisher, a distinguished barrister was chosen to represent Northern Ireland, and Justice Richard Feetham, a South African-based judge, was drafted in to chair the committee.

In July 1924, 100 years ago, the Free State government appointed the Minister for Education, Eoin MacNeill, as its Commissioner. The committee got down to dealing with its formal mandate on November 7th of that year. It was clear from an early stage that Feedham, supported by Fisher, wanted to maintain the border agreed in the Government of Ireland Act (1920) which created the six-county statelet.

Nationalists were gravely disappointed when the deliberations' results, which recommended no territorial change favoring the South, were leaked to the press in November 1925. In response to the angry reaction among nationalists all over the island, MacNeill resigned from the cabinet while challenging the content of the final report and making it clear that it did not have his approval.

The Boundary Report caused a full-blown crisis in the Free State. Prime Minister Cosgrave went to London to try to salvage something from the debris in a meeting with Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin. The effort failed completely. The Minister for External Affairs, Kevin O’Higgins, made a similar trip to Westminster. O'Higgins wanted to internationalize the crisis by involving the League of Nations, which was also rejected.

After failing to make any progress with the British authorities, Dublin called for the Boundary Commission report to be shelved. That was agreed on all sides, and it finally saw the light of day forty-four years later, in 1969.

Gerry OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ordination of Women in the Catholic Church

  Ordination of Women In May 1994 Pope John Paul 11 issued an apostolic letter whose goal was to end for all time any discussion in the Catholic church about ordaining women to the priesthood. The solemn declaration has a ponderous Latin title Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, which marks it as a pronouncement of the highest order. The papal message deals with “the reservation of priestly ordination for men only.” John Paul leaves no doubt about his message:   “In order that all doubt be removed about a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church’s divine constitution, I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgement is to be held definitively by all the Church’s faithful.” So, that is it – the matter is now verboten. The highest authority has spoken categorically on the subject. The many women who feel called by the Spirit to serve as priests must be delusional because Rome has spoken in una...

Abortion in Ireland

Abortion in Ireland      Gerry O'Shea In the early 1980's, 35 or so years ago, a group of sincere and zealous Catholics raised the alarm in Ireland about a major societal problem that wasn't identified by any of the political parties at that time. They pointed to the frequency of abortions in Europe and America and especially in neighboring Britain where they claimed that pregnancy terminations were performed with the same frequency and nonchalance as a dentist carrying out a tooth extraction. These men warned that even though abortion was illegal and no political party at that time was indicating a possible change of policy on the issue, that future politicians or, more likely judges, might change the law and lead the country in the direction of our "pagan" neighbor. Their campaign, which was strongly supported by the Catholic bishops, was successful, and in the fall of 1983 a clause was inserted in the Irish constitution giving equal legal status to a ...

Immigration in America

Immigration Issues in America       Gerry O'Shea Emma Lazarus' famous poem on the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor displays   an amazing   American national   motif, unmatched by any other country. It articulates an open invitation to people from all over the world,   beckoning them, irrespective of their circumstances, to become a part of the American experiment in democracy.   Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore, Send these, your homeless, tempest - tossed to me. Lazarus, a descendant of Sephardic Jews from Portugal, wrote these lines in 1883 at a time when the powerful Know-Nothing movement was in its pomp, especially in New York and Massachusetts. They preached hatred of all immigrants, in particular of the Irish who came to America in the 19th century in their hundreds of thousands to escape poverty and hunger. The Know-No...