Skip to main content

The Rise and Fall of Rudolph Giuliani

The Rise and Fall of Rudolph Giuliani     Gerry OShea

“I have no spur to prick the sides of my intent only Vaulting ambition.” Act 1, Scene 7, Macbeth.

During the 70’s and 80’s New York City was seen by many people as experiencing some form of a nervous breakdown. The statistics for neighborhood crime seemed to follow a cascading downward slide, especially in parts of Manhattan and the Bronx.

Rudy Giuliani was the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 1983 to 1989. He had a reputation for being very tough on crime, whether of the organized variety or just street robberies and muggings. His sterling reputation in this area won him the mayor’s job for two four-year terms ending in 2001.

He can justifiably boast about his fine record in emphatically repulsing the crime surge in all five boroughs. The numbers show that it came down nearly 60% during his eight years - 1250 fewer New Yorkers were killed in 2001 than in 1993 and car thievery was cut in half during that time period.

 City streets were not just safer, they were cleaner. Seventy-five per cent of streets were deemed tidy and well-kept when he was first elected, but when he left Gracie Mansion that figure had boomed to 85%.

The city’s tax burden was the lowest in thirty years. Eleven million more annual tourists were enjoying the museums and theatres than before his time in office. New skyscrapers and apartment towers were springing up across the city.

New York was booming and the accolades were all directed towards the man in charge in City Hall. After 9/11 he rose to fill the part of unifier. He became the take-charge guy, followed by the TV cameras, as he pushed through the rubble and dust of Ground Zero.

People didn’t want to hear about his mistakes in the catastrophic foul-up of the radio communications system that hurt the rescue efforts on 9/11 and enraged many firefighters. Andrew Kirtzman, author of “Giuliani: The Rise and Tragic Fall of America’s Mayor” says about this phase of his subject’s life: “He became a living legend, America’s Mayor, and it was inconceivable that the legend would have an expiration date.”

After finishing his second term as mayor, still wearing his 9/11 robes, he was, as the Irish expression goes, on the pig’s back, with limitless possibilities. He opened his own law firm, signed a $2.7 million advance on a book deal and delivered dozens of $100,000 speeches on leadership themes and related matters. His haul from speaking fees alone was estimated to exceed eight million in 2002.

Feeling that he should focus his schmoozing on the moneyed class, he joined more than a dozen country clubs, bought a lavish co-op in Manhattan and a palatial retreat in the Hamptons. Mr. Giuliani, puffing the most expensive cigars, was living an esoteric version of the American Dream.

He had major problems with two important groups. First, he failed to develop a constituency among African-Americans. He was not seen as a friend in black neighborhoods. He mocked the Black Lives Matter movement and joined Donald Trump in his disgraceful promotion of birtherism.

Trump used this as a wedge issue clearly conveying his racist attitude to a wide and receptive audience all over America. Giuliani’s baseless accusations that Obama did not love his country heightened and prolonged this despicable calumny.

Second, he offended women by the way he demeaned his wives. He cheated on his first wife, Regina Peruggi, from the beginning. He convinced the Vatican that she was a close cousin  which, amazingly, he didn’t know when they tied the knot. Rome gave him an annulment with the right to re-marry. One wag wondered how the Henry V111 story would have worked out if the king had been treated with the same kid gloves.

Wife number two was a household name and face to most New Yorkers, a local TV news anchor called Donna Hanover. We are used to celebrity marriages collapsing, but when Giuliani announced the dissolution of his marriage at a press conference before he had even informed Ms. Hanover, women especially viewed this crass act of humiliating his wife as the behavior of a lowlife, lacking class and unconnected to ethical principles.

There was talk for a few months of a New York showdown with Hilary Clinton for a Senate seat but, in addition to the deterrence of a worrying bout of prostate cancer the message from women all over the state came through that they would not row in behind an out-of-control philanderer.

Eight years later he tried unsuccessfully to make a go of it in the presidential race. Joe Biden memorably described his parroted script as noun-verb-9/11. He came in third in the Florida primary and walked away with no further plans for elective office. He is now 78 years old.

 Today, Rudy Giuliani is reportedly broke, suspended from practicing law in Washington and New York and on the verge of indictment for election tampering. He was stiffed by his boss, Donald Trump, who refused to pay his substantial legal fees, leaving him on the verge of bankruptcy.

 He is now considered so much of a has-been that in perhaps “the unkindest cut of all” the major networks declined to even interview him in their programming for the 20th anniversary of 9/11.

In becoming the courtier and roving fixer for Donald Trump, he led the charge for reversing the official results in multiple state courts. He knew that Joe Biden won but he was the man using belligerent language fomenting the mob on January 6th. It was Giuliani who disgracefully urged the angry gathering on the ellipse “to have trial by combat” before they left for the Capitol.

His appearance, seemingly inebriated, in front of the Four Seasons Landscaping in northeast Philadelphia, talking about his jaundiced view of the presidential election while black shoe polish ran down the side of his face, remains a talking point about a pitiful and broken man.

King David’s powerful lament recorded in the Book of Samuel when he heard of the deaths in battle of Saul and Jonathan seems appropriate here: How the mighty have fallen!

Gerry OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Child Rearing in Ireland in the 20th Century

 Child Rearing in 20th Century Ireland       Gerry OShea  It is a truism accepted in most cultures that children thrive in a supportive family and in a community where they feel valued and encouraged. The old Irish adage “mol an oige agus tiocfaidh se” (praise young people and they will blossom) contains  important wisdom from the ancient Celts. However, for most of the 20th century in Ireland, this advice in Shakespeare’s words  was “more honored in the breach than in the observance.” There were two important considerations that underpinned Irish child-rearing practices throughout most of the last century. First, contraceptives were not available until late in the 1980’s mainly because of opposition by the Catholic Church, so big families were an important feature of Irish life. Think of parents in a crowded house rearing eight or ten kids and obliged to maintain order in the family. Anyone who stepped out of line would likely be slapped or otherwise physically reprimanded. According

Reflections of an Immigrant

  Reflections of an Immigrant             Gerry OShea I came to America on a student visa in the summer of 1968. I travelled with a college friend, Ignatius Coffey, who hails from Labasheeda in County Clare. We were attending University College Dublin (UCD) after completing a second year studying the Arts curriculum. As evening students we were making our way by working in various jobs because our parents could not afford to cover our living expenses. So, we arrived in New York on the last day of May with very few dollars in the back pocket wondering if this new country would give us a break. I had uncles and aunts in New York who were a big help in providing meals and subsistence. A first cousin’s husband, who worked in Woolworth’s warehouse in Harlem and who was one of about six shop stewards in the Teamsters Union there, found us a job in his place, despite the line of American students knocking at the door. The pay was good and we worked every hour of overtime that we could

A Changing Ireland

  A Changing Ireland         Gerry OShea “ You talk to me of nationality, language, religion ,” Stephen Dedalus declared in Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. “I shall try to fly by those nets.” In response, one of his nationalist friends asked Stephen the bottom-line question “ Are you Irish at all?” According to the most recent Irish census that question is answered in the affirmative by no less than 23% of citizens who identify as non-white Irish. The number of Irish citizens born abroad, increased in 2022 and now accounts for 12% of the population. The biggest non-native groups come from Poland and the UK followed by India, Romania, Lithuania, and Brazil. In 2021, the year preceding the census, over 89,000 people moved to live in Ireland, with India and Brazil leading the way. How do the people feel about the big infusion of foreigners into the country? A 2020 Economic and Social Research Institute study revealed a gap between the public and private perceptions and a