Skip to main content

Majority Rules!



Majority Rules - Really!      Gerry O'Shea


In the presidential election in 2000 Al Gore won the popular vote but he lost the election. We had a similar story in 2016 when Hillary Clinton polled close to three million more votes than Donald Trump and again came in second. The Gore and Clinton defeats had enormous consequences for the country. Think the disastrous invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the current daily chaos in the White House.


Why not simply have a majority rule system, the candidate who gets the highest number of votes wins, which is what most people understand by democracy?


In the late 18th century as America was asserting its freedom from Great Britain, the Declaration of Independence stated that "all men are created equal," but  the revolutionary leaders didn't really mean these words in their clear meaning because, to begin with, non-whites and women were not included.


In addition, the American revolutionaries also gave considerable credibility to a common prejudice of the European aristocracy, namely that while the common people could be relied on to fight bravely in their many wars, they believed that the ordinary folk lacked the intelligence and breeding to elect good rulers.


To guard against the imagined excesses of the rabble making mistakes and electing radical leaders, James Madison and company built a system of checks and balances with two main protections for the status quo in America. First they introduced the Electoral College to act as a kind of screen of the popular results in presidential elections, and then they initiated a second chamber, the senate, where the smallest states have the same representation as California or New York. Today, for example, twelve states with 4% of the total population of the United States account for 24 - almost 25% - of the 100 votes in the senate.


Democracy was circumscribed for the benefit of those writing the rules - a statement that still prevails today. Consider the following examples which demonstrate that the wishes of the people often don't carry much weight in Washington.


All polls show that a big majority of Americans want restrictions on ownership of firearms, including a requirement that citizens should have to get a police permit, similar to a driver's license, before being allowed to own a gun. However, the National Rifle Association, a very rich and powerful lobbying group, opposes any such restriction, and nearly all Republicans - and a few Democrats too - get a big campaign check from the NRA which ensures that any progressive proposal for new legislation in this important area is stymied from the beginning.


 Despite the popular outcry for change in the laws governing firearms possession after every school shooting, there has been no meaningful legislation in this area for many years and zero prospect for a new proposal by this congress.


Another example of Washington's unresponsiveness to an issue where a broad consensus for change exists among the American people concerns access to adequate healthcare. It is shameful that the United States, alone among Western democracies, doesn't provide this basic benefit for millions of its citizens.


The most recent push for health-care reform happened in 2010 when the Affordable Care Act was proposed. Initially it included a "public option" whereby ordinary Americans could purchase their insurance directly from the government at a considerably lower price than private insurance companies were charging for similar policies.


Needless to say, the private insurance companies viewed this new law as cutting into their profits and they lobbied very forcefully against it. In the Senate, Joseph Lieberman, an independent senator from Connecticut who usually supported the Democrats, provided the vital vote that killed the bill in that chamber.


 There are dozens of insurance companies in Connecticut and they donated big bucks for the Lieberman campaigns over many years. That is the shameful way that the "public option", which would have been so beneficial for millions of Americans, was defeated.


The Affordable Care Act ended the ability by insurance companies to refuse coverage for pre-existing medical conditions. Polls show that more than three quarters of Americans support the current law guaranteeing coverage for pre-existing conditions. Still, Republicans, prompted by their big money supporters, are promising to ditch it when they get a chance.


 It is significant that for every $100 spent lobbying in favor of progressive legislative changes that benefit the poor and working class, about $600 is spent to move the economic  needle even more in favor of those who are already affluent. Money talks every day in Washington on most issues with a far more powerful voice than the opinions of the majority of  people.


Gerry O'Shea blogs at  wemustbetalking.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

    Unionist Isolation in Northern Ireland              Gerry OShea Joe Brolly, known as a fine footballer and lively commentator on big Gaelic matches on Irish television, writes a regular column in the Sunday Independent in Dublin. Recently, he penned an uncharacteristically bitter essay about the celebrations in Belfast following the victory of Glasgow Rangers in the Scottish Football League. Joe had no problem with fans celebrating the win, their first in ten years, but the carry-on by Rangers supporters in the Shankill Road area left him in a foul mood. The old gutter anti-Catholic tropes were heard throughout the crowd. Hurrah! Hurrah! We are the Billy Boys   --- Up tae yer knees in Finian blood.   Surrender or ye’ll die. He noted that the following day the police superintendent responsible for the area, Nigel Henry, expressed his “disappointment” about a large crowd partying in clear breach of the Covid restrictions on gatherings in the city. A few weeks previously Mar

Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism                Gerry OShea The story is told that shortly after the great trade union leader Mike Quill arrived in New York, he inquired about what kind of government existed in America. After someone gave him a brief explanation, he replied “well we are against the government anyway.” Mike had just come from a family that fought the British in the Irish War of Independence and that was equally hostile to the Free State Government which took over in Dublin in 1922, four years before he left for the United states from his home in Kilgarvan, County Kerry. President Reagan’s oft-quoted statement that “the most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I am here to help” always evokes   loud applause from conservative audiences. His words encapsulate the belief that the less state involvement in all aspects of life the better. They always make one exception for military spending, and so they endorse the present defense budget in the U

Anger in America

  Anger in America                     Gerry OShea Rage is dominating the American body politic. The culture has become so toxic that we can no longer just agree to disagree.   In April of this year, reputable pollsters revealed that 70% of Republicans declared that the presidential election was stolen and Donald Trump should be re-installed in the White House. A September gauge of opinion showed that the figure of Republican disbelievers in the Biden presidency has grown to a whopping 78%. It is important to explain that there is not a scintilla of evidence supporting this erroneous contention. Mr. Trump’s lawyers’ claims of electoral impropriety were considered by close to sixty judges, some of whom were appointed by the former president, and none of them even allowed the case to be heard because no evidence of wrongdoing was presented in court. The Supreme Court with a strong influence of Trump appointees refused even to consider the case. The Department of Justice under Wil