Transgender Issues in America Gerry OShea
The name Sisters
of Perpetual Indulgence (SPI) appeared in recent news reports and,
understandably, drew guffaws from many observers. The title is a spoof on
religious orders who sometimes work with unwieldy names.
The SPI members who come mostly from the queer
and transgender communities dress in technicolor habits and, like so many real
Sisters, they collect money to help poor and marginalized groups who have benefited
by about $1.5 million since their foundation in 1979.
These make-up
Sisters achieved a degree of fame recently when the Los Angeles Dodgers
invited, uninvited and finally re-invited them to the club’s annual gay-pride
night game where they received the Community Hero Award for their charitable
work.
The baseball
team management was justifiably criticized by some Catholics who resented the
use of nuns’ garb to gain notoriety for their cause. Others, including some
real Sisters, who share their concern about the maltreatment of the non-binary
community, applauded the Dodgers’ final decision.
Bill Clinton
first marked June as national “gay and lesbian pride month” back in 1999. Since
then, the scope of the pride designation has expanded. President Obama included
people of different gender identities in the annual celebration, and this year
President Biden opened it up to include “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender,
queer and intersex” communities. LG has become LGBTQI+. Well done Joe Biden
although I had to google the meaning of the “I” word.
A clear
majority (71%) of Americans now favor same-sex marriage, but a recent YouGov
poll indicates that one third of Americans are turned off by the confusing
multiplicity of new sexual variations. Interestingly, that poll also reveals that
over 30% believe that society needs to move faster in the direction of full
acceptance of people of all sexual orientations.
These gender
identity issues provide the driving force for the Republican agenda in the 2024
presidential election. It is easy to poke fun at and ascribe blame to a
vulnerable minority whose lifestyle seems radically different from “ordinary”
people. This provides a powerful populist mishmash for many leaders on the
political right, especially in this case when it is used to conjure up scenes
of moral depravity.
The
Republican Party is already associating Democrats with support for gay rights of
all kinds, which is true. Nearly all of the declared contenders for their party’s
nomination include a denunciation of LGBTQI+ rights with a loud call to arms
against what they dismissively call transgenderism.
By blaming drag
shows and books with queer characters they hope to beat the drum of fear and disenchantment.
Nikki Haley has suggested - without any evidence - that trans children playing
in girls’ sports has somehow led to more teenage girls contemplating suicide.
Ron DeSantis
epitomizes the far right’s turgid dismissal of the feelings in the non-binary
community. His so-called “Don’t Say Gay” laws in Florida prohibit teachers from
discussing sexual orientation or gender identity with their students.
We badly
need to reflect on the impact of our laws and attitudes on what is broadly
termed the gay community. The respect that accompanies the open-minded
live-and-let-live approach to life would lift the dark clouds of intolerance and
unearned condemnation that still prevail against LGBTQI+ people. We need some
consequential moral leaders to preach that prejudice and disrespect shown
towards any law-abiding group is unconscionable and contrary to all ethical
principles.
Among
non-binary adults, male and female, 82% report feeling emotional abuse during
childhood, 52% were bullied and 11% were subjected to so-called conversion
therapy. This study also found that 94% of this group have considered suicide
and 39% have attempted ending it all to escape negative community and sometimes
family pressure.
Giving clear
notice of their priorities in the upcoming presidential contest, more than 540
anti-transgender bills were filed by Republicans at both state and federal
levels in 2023, three times the number that were proposed in 2022. Five years earlier
only 26 of these prejudicial bills were considered. While most of them target
transgender youth and their families, others place limits on the entire trans
community’s access to public life.
I guarantee
that you will hear much more from Republicans across the country about the
pseudo - problems allegedly posed by transgender people than any policies
geared to improving educational outcomes or dealing with climate change.
Donald Trump
seems bewildered by this new cultural emphasis o the trans community. “I talk
about cutting taxes, people go like that, but when I talk about transgender
everyone goes crazy. Five years ago you didn’t know what the hell it was.”
These 540
regressive pieces of proposed legislation represent American lawmaking at its
very lowest and most incoherent. They include bans on medical care and insurance
coverage, participation in sports, bathroom use, as well as measures requiring
schoolteachers and counselors to out transgender students.
For youth living in unsupportive homes, forced
outing frequently leads to homelessness and even worse.
Religious
conservatives hiding behind biblical verses designed to meet the needs of
long-ago times and cultures, who lost their fight against gay marriage but have
now trained their eyes on the growing numbers in the transgender community.
For instance, over the course of three weeks
in 2022 Fox News ran 170 negative segments about transgender people. Beating
the drum of prejudice and exclusion seems to come easily to this allegedly
Christian community.
What about
the powerful Catholic Church in the United States? What do the bishops have to
say about this hot-button topic? Where does it fit in with their understanding of
the spirit of the New Testament?
In an
article in the National Catholic Reporter, Daniel P. Horan, a Capuchin priest
and distinguished theologian, describes a recent official paper promulgated by
the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops dealing with transgender
issues as “nothing short of a disaster, theologically, scientifically and
pastorally.”
The full rather
forbidding title of this document reads as follows: Doctrinal Notes on the
Moral Limits to Technological Manipulation of the Human Body. It
calls on Catholic hospitals and other healthcare institutions to refuse
treatment for patients suffering from gender dysphoria – an acute sense of
distress caused by a mismatch between a person’s sense of gender identity and
his or her sex identification at birth.
Fr. Horan
argues convincingly that we must respect the ongoing scientific research that
continues to explore the causes and appropriate treatment for this condition.
He asserts in the strongest language that the bishops’ approach on this complex
matter “betrays a gross ignorance about
what the medical and scientific community has taught the world.”
Gerry
OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com
Comments
Post a Comment