American Gun Culture Gerry OShea
I have spent
about half my life in the United States and the remainder in Ireland. From
early on in New York, I was struck by the glaring differences between the two countries in the
area of gun ownership. In America, there are more guns around than people; to
be precise, every hundred residents possess, on average, one hundred and twenty
firearms. By comparison, in Ireland the number of people owning a gun in the
same proportion comes to just seven.
The
historical context for this Irish number merits reflection. After the
Anglo-Irish Treaty was approved in the Dublin parliament in January 1922, a strong
minority, who believed that the agreement was a sell-out, took up arms in defiance
of the new government and a short but often savage civil war ensued.
To help deal with the crisis, the ruling
cabinet set up the Special Infantry Corps (SIC), an armed group of about 4000
men divided into eight battalions, to impose law and order in the new state.
Apart from dealing with civil war disturbances, the SIC supported government
pressure to end a spate of workers’ strikes, and they focused also on closing
the plethora of illegal mountain distilleries that were cropping up all over the
country. The SIC was disbanded in December
of 1923, about six months after the civil war finished.
Interestingly,
despite the daily emergencies facing the new Dublin regime, the police force
they established, the gardai, was not allowed to carry guns of any kind. They
asserted their authority over miscreants by using a hefty disciplinary baton.
Their immediate predecessors, the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC), functioned as
an armed force as indeed did the post-partition Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC)
in Northern Ireland.
The new
government wisely chose to follow the English Bobby tradition of unarmed policing,
so the gardai were instructed to maintain order without resorting to firearms.
Their record in doing so is rightly admired by Irish people everywhere, and their
stress on unarmed community policing played a big part in removing the gun from
Irish politics. Very few gardai were killed in the century since Irish
independence, and the toll of civilian deaths in dealing with the police also remains
miniscule.
The American
story is very different. Lawmen carrying guns are central to the American
narrative since George Washington. And the easy availability of all kinds of
firearms accounts for hundreds of deaths every week. Police officers all over
the country are armed, and citizens expect them to use their weapons to impose
order in the community.
The frontier
mythology, still strong in many states, always involves men with guns asserting
their authority as they moved West to develop mining and to claim land for
ranching. William Cody, the man behind the Buffalo Bill glorification legend,
developed a big show that travelled around the United States and Europe,
drawing huge crowds for every presentation. Cody never called it a show - for
him and his audiences the gunslingers were presented as heroic cowboys. Tough
luck on the Indians who were pushed aside by superior weaponry.
Cody’s
romanticizing of the American West spawned hundreds of stories of gunmen – good
guys and bad – asserting holster power in all conflict situations. Hollywood
perpetuated the largely made-up stories about bumpy stagecoaches, bat-wing
saloon doors, and cattle barons always backed by a small army of gunmen. In
this context might and power nearly always trumped over right.
The famous showdown at the OK Corral in
Tombstone remains a powerful symbol of those times. Ironically, from a contemporary perspective, many
towns had ordinances requiring riders passing through to give up their guns for
the duration of their stay. A gang of five toughies, known as The Cowboys,
refused to follow this protocol and were confronted by the Earp brothers,
Virgil, Morgan and Wyatt, joined by the legendary Doc Holliday, killing three
of them in the famous shootout.
Never mind that the gang leader sued the
Earps, claiming that his men had raised their hands in legal compliance before
the brothers opened fire. He lost the case but historians remain unsure about
what really happened in Tombstone that day.
The
glorification of firearms remains central to the American story. While, after
Uvalde, the country was engaged in debate about somehow protecting innocents
from gun violence, “Top Gun: Maverick” was the cinema blockbuster for those
weeks. That movie and many others as well as popular video games where the hero
uses his automatic weapon to waste all around him point to a deep and
unfortunate culture of guns, violence and brutality.
The Uvalde massacre
of nineteen fourth graders and two teachers, who valiantly tried to protect
their charges, has elicited a deep revulsion among people everywhere. The line
from the Irish ballad catches the general mood “a raging cry went up to very
heaven.” Imagine the feelings of those 10-year olds as a boy-man came into
their classroom using a legally-owned semi-automatic rifle and mowed them down,
decapitating some children, without any semblance of mercy.
This brutal
slaughter of innocents was not a singular event. Within nine days, there were
twenty more mass shootings, which is defined by the FBI as an event resulting
in the death or injury of at least four people. A grim perspective points to
the fact that the Tombstone showdown wouldn’t qualify for inclusion by today’s
measurement.
Senator
Chris Murphy from Connecticut has assembled a bi-partisan group to try to reach
a gun-control agreement that would pass the senate. The Democratic House, led
by Nancy Pelosi, ensures passage of any progressive gun control legislation in
their bailiwick. However, at least ten Republican senators will have to get
behind a bill in the upper house. Already off the table because of a Republican
veto is the idea of raising the age to purchase semi-automatic weapons from 18
to 21.
No doubting
Senator Murphy’s sincerity but the system is rigged because the National Rifle
Association has an effective veto over any proposal. Opponents of change suggest
hiring more mental health workers, which might have some impact on the margins,
but would be unworkable in any large community.
Another
conservative “solution” proposes arming teachers which is equally ludicrous.
Think of a teacher with a pistol in his drawer dealing with an intruder
carrying an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle.
Americans
must face reality: until gun ownership is strictly controlled mass shootings in
supermarkets and schools will continue. Is there any serious reader who doubts
this basic truth?
Every
firearm should be registered and every owner must have a license to use one.
About three-hours of professional training in gun use must be completed before
the person gets legal possession of a deadly weapon.
Semi-automatic and automatic guns have no
place in any community outside of the military. Federal law should ban their
use outright and bar their sale in any gun shop. There is no possible
benevolent reason why any citizen, outside of the military, should ever use
one.
Unfortunately,
legislating for these common-sense provisions for gun ownership in America remains
a pipe dream. We have a long way to go.
Sadly, school massacres will continue.
Gerry
OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com
Comments
Post a Comment