Skip to main content

A Crazy World


A Crazy World                    Gerry OShea

I thought of the Christian Crusades recently when reading about Russian Patriarch Kirill 1 giving a fulsome benediction to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Back in the 12th and 13th centuries various popes offered all kinds of spiritual benefits, including the forgiveness of sin, to men who agreed to participate in one of the many armies marching east to defeat the Muslims forces occupying Jerusalem.

These crusading wars represent a shameful part of the Christian story, generated by a basic misunderstanding of the core gospel message. Leaders wearing cassocks and miters urging their followers to slaughter members of a different faith convey Roman leadership at its worst.

In March of this year Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill consulted, thanks to the power of zoom. It did not go well!  Kirill read a 20-minute diatribe against the West, justifying the Russian mayhem in his neighboring country. He called Putin’s long leadership tenure “a miracle of god,” praising his strong defense against the liberal conspiracies that allegedly promote “gay parades” in Kyiv and other cities.

Francis attempted to advise him that as leading churchmen they should not be acting as deacons for any belligerent government, certainly not in support of a country attacking a neighbor. Kirill was not impressed and left Francis questioning why his counterpart in Moscow was acting like “Putin’s altar boy.”

A patriarch providing a blessing for the Russian planes strafing the villages and towns in the Donbas region is only one of a host of events and happenings that remind us what a topsy-turvy world we inhabit. Our systems are in disarray, lacking any rhyme or coherent reason.

Doug Mastriano easily won the Republican nomination for governor in Pennsylvania, a swing state that has alternated between the two parties in presidential elections over the last half century.

Mr. Mastriano is still promoting the Big Lie, that somehow Donald Trump won Pennsylvania and the 2020 presidential election. He expects him to be the Republican candidate again in 2024 and, with a clear glint in his eye, he assured a recent audience that, irrespective of the popular vote, as governor he will appoint the secretary of state who in turn names the presidential electors, so there will be no repeat of the 2020 steal.

Keep in mind that there is no subterfuge here. Mastriano is giving public notice of his intentions to disregard the legal result if the need arises. This approach is not without precedent. In the months leading up to the November 2020 election, Donald Trump, who was behind Joe Biden by a few points in most polls, declared that only he could win the November showdown. Any other result would be fraudulent. More recently, Mr. Trump urged Dr. Oz to claim victory in the close Republican senatorial primary in Pennsylvania before all the votes are  tabulated.

Mastriano is not an isolated voice. The New York Times published a review of legislative votes, records and official statements of Republican leaders in the battleground states. The results of this study found that 357 party leaders have used the power of their office to seek to overturn or, at least, discredit the results of the 2020 presidential contest. In Arizona this applies to 81% of these top Republicans; in Pennsylvania just a little less at 78%; Wisconsin scored at 73% and Michigan just under half at 48% of local lawmakers, all of whom favor overturning the official results.

Just more than eighteen months ago President Trump and his docile vice-president, Mike Pence, were campaigning for re-election. They lost.  The vice-president did his ceremonial job in certifying the results. Trump urged him not to fulfill his important legal obligation but, instead, to send the results back to be re-assessed by state legislators. Pence correctly disregarded his boss’s pleas and Joe Biden’s victory was affirmed. The January 6th rioters turned on their vice-president, hanging his effigy.

Today, the former president and vice-president no longer engage in civil conversation, and in fact, each campaigned for different Republicans vying to become governor of Georgia. Pence supported the current governor, Brian Kemp, who defied Trump’s urging to invalidate the election, while former Senator David Perdue, at Trump’s behest,  spent millions promoting the coup to override the real results.

Kemp won by over 50% while Brad Raffensperger, the secretary of state who, more than anyone drew Trump’s anger by refusing to “find” the 11,780 votes he wanted for victory, also hammered his Trump-backed opponent, Congressman Jody Hice.

American Catholic leaders also seem to have lost their way. The dictum pronounced in every seminary, Roma locuta est, Causa finita est (Rome has spoken; their decision is final) no longer holds.

Pope Francis strongly advised against using the eucharist as a disciplinary tool. He stressed that communion should not be seen as a reward for saints but as a sacred food for sinners. He welcomed President Biden in the Vatican calling him a good Catholic, despite his approval of the Roe decision on abortion. He recognized that the policies Biden espouses on dealing with poverty and caring for the environment are far closer to his teaching as set down in two encyclicals than Republican ideas.

Archbishop John Cordileone decided to politicize the abortion issue by banning Nancy Pelosi from the altar rails in the archdiocese of San Francisco. This extreme and unprecedented punitive act, based on her support for a woman’s right to choose, was acclaimed by some church hardliners, but most Catholics stand with Francis who would have no problem affirming Mrs. Pelosi, a woman who defines herself as a devout Catholic who always attends to her weekly mass obligation.

The most damning contradiction between a sane society and its opposite is again on display after nineteen children and two teachers were mowed down by a frustrated and angry 18-year old in Uvalde, near San Antonio. This horrific incident was a sequel to another young man of the same age who executed ten Black people in a supermarket in Buffalo, New York. Both killers had easy access to deadly weapons.

Repeated opinion polls reveal that close to 90% of Americans support a mandatory background check on any applicant for a firearm, with ownership of automatic guns confined to law-enforcement personnel. Other sensible and popular requirements require some minimum training in firearm use followed by a basic test as applies in getting a license to drive a car.

The powerful and rich National Rifle Association (NRA) claims that 18-year-olds should be entitled to carry weapons, including quick-firing semi-automatic ones. Republicans support them and so, just in the last two years, sensible enactments restricting gun ownership passed the House but failed in the Senate.

The cries of a classroom of helpless fourth graders and their teachers  touch a new depth of rage among ordinary people. How could they compete against an armed frustrated bully? Where will the next outrage be? Are we any closer to legislation that would curb this madness? Or are we doomed to continue in a dark system where a clear majority of the citizens say that gun ownership calls for a background check but nothing happens and we await the next school massacre?

Gerry OShea blogs at


Popular posts from this blog

Reflections of an Immigrant

  Reflections of an Immigrant             Gerry OShea I came to America on a student visa in the summer of 1968. I travelled with a college friend, Ignatius Coffey, who hails from Labasheeda in County Clare. We were attending University College Dublin (UCD) after completing a second year studying the Arts curriculum. As evening students we were making our way by working in various jobs because our parents could not afford to cover our living expenses. So, we arrived in New York on the last day of May with very few dollars in the back pocket wondering if this new country would give us a break. I had uncles and aunts in New York who were a big help in providing meals and subsistence. A first cousin’s husband, who worked in Woolworth’s warehouse in Harlem and who was one of about six shop stewards in the Teamsters Union there, found us a job in his place, despite the line of American students knocking at the door. The pay was good and we worked every hour of overtime that we could

Mary Magdalene

  Mary Magdalene                        Gerry OShea After the crucifixion the fledgling movement of Christians commemorated the life and death of a man who had deeply impacted their lives and who they firmly believed had come back from the dead   for reasons they didn’t understand but which included his love for them. The records we have of those times reveal that his early followers met in small groups to support each other in prayer and community as they tried to come to terms with the monumental events that they had witnessed, and this process continued into the generations that followed. The four gospels were mostly written late in the first century, probably completed in the early years of the following one. There is evidence of women playing leadership roles in the deliberations and ceremonial practices in those early centuries. However, as time went on the leadership structure reflected more and more the male-dominated culture that consigned women to minor ecclesial roles

The Ordination of Women

  The Ordination of Women         Gerry OShea About seven years ago, my wife and I participated in a mass in San Antonio, Texas, where the main celebrant was a woman. We were part of about three hundred people attending a conference under the auspices of Call to Action, a Catholic organization that takes a jaundiced view of how women are treated in the church and which rejects some traditional Vatican pronouncements especially in the area of sexuality. The mass was a memorable event with a pervasive sense of community, and the priest who preached the sermon did a masterful job. We were staying with a priest friend who worked in a parish nearby. At breakfast the following morning we shared our positive reaction with him and two of his colleagues. He and a younger man responded positively saying that, of course, women priests would be a big plus for the ecclesial community. The third man had a different perspective. He pointed out that the “so-called priests” were excommunicated,