Clericalism in the Catholic
Church Gerry OShea
Consider the
following imaginary meeting arranged to discuss the demeaning treatment of
women in the Catholic church. In attendance are five mothers from different
ethnic and socio-economic backgrounds who meet just two requirements for
inclusion: they must identify as Catholics and they must all have at least one
daughter.
Also in the
room, representing the church, are five members of the hierarchy. The gathering
takes place in New York, so Cardinal Dolan has summoned other bishops with
strong credentials in theology to make sure that the Vatican perspective is
fully represented.
The women
explain their grievances, focusing especially on the fact that, because of
their sex, they are prohibited from any jurisdictional involvement in their
church. They stress that there are no similar restrictions on them from
assuming leadership roles in any other area of their lives.
One of the prelates with a string of degrees
from the prestigious Gregorian University in Rome opens the discussion by
explaining that the Lord chose twelve males to lead his church and that is
their core reason for keeping women away from any position of authority.
The first
woman responded by suggesting that Christ, like all human beings, reflected the
wisdom and tensions of his time. In that Middle Eastern culture, for instance,
not only were women treated as inferiors but slavery was also accepted as
normal. She completely rejected the idea that the appointment of twelve male
apostles 2000 years ago should determine the ecclesiastical status of women
today.
Another one
of the five females addressed the group by apologizing about raising the
sensitive matter of sexual abuse of children because she knew it was very
embarrassing for the church leaders, especially with so many court cases
pending. How, she asked, could any bishop anticipate respect when he failed to
care for children in his diocese? How can any church leader escape criticism
for moving predator priests from one parish to another?
Another
woman, clearly irate at the horrible abuse inflicted on innocent minors, claimed
that a group of mothers, housewives without degrees in theology or apologetics,
would have dealt very differently with this problem. She requested that the
bishops think of the sagacity of women in their own families when considering
this insight.
One of the
bishops admitted that this crisis was poorly handled and the Vatican has
learned lessons. A colleague added that church leaders deal more maturely with
sex abuse cases today, especially by involving the civil authorities.
Another
bishop felt that there was a lack of perspective in the women’s criticism which
is often shared by media outlets that always seem to work a grudge against the
church. He asked where is the recognition of the fact that Catholic agencies
run development programs for poor women all over the world. No other institution
comes close to matching this commitment to the most vulnerable women.
The final woman
speaker wondered how they explain the exodus from the church of over 750,000
members in America every year, many of whom change to various Protestant
denominations that have no problem with women priests and bishops.
There were
no raised voices or harsh language during the discussion; in fact, at the end,
Cardinal Dolan talked about another meeting in a few months!
Pope Francis
has many admirable qualities but decisive leadership is not one of them.
At the
Amazon Synod the members – all wearing Roman collars - reacting to the dire scarcity of priests to
provide the Eucharist for poor indigenous communities in that massive region,
voted 128 to 41 in favor of ordaining viri probati, married men of good
character, to meet these urgent pastoral needs. A similar clear synodal
majority indicated that women should be ordained as deacons to provide the
sacraments for the people.
Francis
praised the clerics for their work and took these recommendations under
advisement, putting any implementation on a long finger. In other words, he
funked the challenge and left millions of poor members of his church without
the sacraments.
The Spirit
of Wisdom, a spirit of positive thinking and enlightened ideas, has changed
attitudes to women completely, mainly because they became far more assertive,
and today we see nothing extraordinary about top female leaders in business and
government. There is a real prospect for a woman being elected president of the
United States in the foreseeable future.
However, the
Vatican hasn’t changed, especially in its pronouncements in the area of
sexuality. Against the overwhelming scientific evidence, they argue that
homosexual love is unnatural and therefore morally wrong. Following this unenlightened
logic, they rule out even blessing a gay marriage union.
The official
teaching of the Catholic Church forbids the use of condoms or the contraceptive
pill even by married couples. This moral reasoning, based on medieval thinking
about the human body, has led many young people to depart for other religions
or none. About 40% of people born Catholics have left their family church. It
is estimated that 16% of Americans identify themselves as former members of the
Roman religion.
The Second
Vatican Council in the 1960’s was the last universal Council of the Catholic Church.
That renowned assembly was called by Pope John XX111, by far the most
distinguished and perceptive church leader in modern times. He instructed the
assembled bishops and experts to open the windows and let the enlightened
truths of modernity influence their deliberations.
The Council highlighted
the pivotal importance and authority of what they called “the people of God” which
implicitly limited the status of those already making all the decisions. Understandably,
the powerful prelates did not appreciate this democratization of their accrued
power, so they made sure that it didn’t happen. Lay people have no more say in
their church now than they had in the 1950’s.
The Council
pointed out that confining the inspiration of the Spirit to the clergy breaches
basic tenets of theology. Wisdom resides as surely with the farmer or housewife
as with titled clerics. The Vatican cannot accept even minor limitations on its
accumulated powers.
Dealing with
the synodal process, Pope Francis, a man of compassion, has to sort out a
Vatican conundrum: he knows that the church needs to change in dramatic ways,
but the weight of institutional history prods him to hold firm to the old
rationalizations.
Still, he
said recently that he wants to hear from all people. We wish him well in
pursuing that worthy goal. Clericalism in all its guises needs to be confronted
if the church moves towards the spirit of the gospels.
If Cardinal
Dolan calls another meeting to continue the dialogue with the five Catholic
women with daughters, I will keep you informed!
Gerry
OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com
Comments
Post a Comment