Sexuality and the Catholic Church Gerry OShea
The
encyclical Laudato Si surely stands out as Pope Francis’ signature
contribution to humanity. In it he identifies the earth as “our home” which we
have carelessly neglected, especially since the Industrial Revolution that was
getting underway two hundred years ago.
The consequences
of our immature behavior, a proliferation of floods, fires, droughts and
famines, are clear, and the perilous state of our oceans points to a worsening
crisis.
There have
been five previous mass extinctions of life in the universe. Francis has raised
a large red flag warning that we may well be heading for another.
This pope is
also prophetic in his regular pronouncements on the devastating consequences of
the prevailing level of world poverty. No other international leader can match
his denunciations of economic systems that tolerate such awful levels of human
deprivation. He mocks the neo-liberal contention, with its many acolytes in the
United States, that the best way to improve the lot of the poor is to make the
rich even richer so some of their largesse will dribble downwards.
However,
when it comes to sexuality, the record of popes in this crucial human area is
abysmal. I hear a comment from stage right: what can you expect from a bunch of
old white celibates who are often seen around the Vatican wearing dresses and
other fancy apparel designed in the time of the Emperor Constantine during the
fourth century!
Away from
the cynicism, British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, was married recently in a
Catholic church, and we wish him and his new wife, Carrie, and their one-year-old
baby the best of luck. However, the news created consternation especially among
many traditional churchgoers. He was divorced last year from Maria Wheeler
after twenty-seven years and four children together. His first marriage back in
the 80’s to Allegra Mostyn-Owen only lasted a few years and did not yield any
progeny.
The case is
complicated because while Boris and Carrie were baptized Catholics, he was
confirmed as an Anglican and, so it seems he was not deemed a Catholic for his
first two marriages which, according to canon law, freed him up for a third run
at the sacrament.
Any divorced Catholic in a long-term
relationship must be completely bewildered trying to understand why, not only is
he disallowed from re-marrying but he doesn’t even qualify to receive communion
on Sunday.
People
wonder if Henry V111 got the Boris kid-glove treatment from Pope Clement in the
16th century in dealing with his multiple wives, would that have
prevented the Reformation in England and all the angst and division that
followed it.
In March of
this year, the magisterium in Rome, with the pope’s written approval,
pronounced that the church forbids any priestly blessing at the wedding of a
same-sex couple.
This
declaration upset many Catholics. Johanny Bonny, Bishop of Antwerp in Belgium,
said that as a consequence he lost 700 members in his diocese. In New York, Fr.
James Martin, well-known for his espousal of gay rights, reported that about a
dozen people contacted him to say that this was the final indignity which led
them to the ecclesiastical exit door. Dozens of priests and theologians,
especially in Europe, declared publicly that, following the spirit of the gospel,
they will disobey the Vatican order.
Blessing a
couple entails wishing them good luck as they embark in a new chapter of their
lives. The priest solemnly calls on God to extend his graciousness to two
people facing all the vicissitudes of married life.
The negative
Vatican explanatory statement uses the pathetic reasoning that God could not
bless a sin. Surely, some theologian in Rome should have cautioned against the
arrogance of claiming to talk for the deity – especially on a controversial
issue.
The Natural
Law argument can be fairly stated in pelvic terms. The congruence of male and
female biology clearly leads to female pregnancy. Very natural indeed! However,
to conclude that this is the only kind of sexual behavior that is ethically
permissible closes doors of love that should be wide open.
This
knitting of sex exclusively to procreation creates major theoretical and
practical problems. The church allows infertile straight couples to marry. No
problem with a post-menopausal woman tying the knot with a man of any age.
Around 4% of
Americans, males and females, are homosexual. The vast majority of scientists
agree that this is not a life choice. Sexual orientation is determined before
birth, mainly by genetics and hormones. LGBTQ people are no more responsible
for their sexual preference than heterosexual people are.
It is only
in the last half-century or so that scientific research has established that
people are born with different sexual orientations. However, the Vatican keeps
acting as if we are still living in 1921.
The
Judaeo-Christian tradition personalizes God. He is portrayed as being actively
involved in every part of creation. So, people thank her for good health and a
long life, and, in this tradition, one would have to assert that God made
millions of mistakes in all the queer people that have lived. This is
theologically preposterous.
The biblical
wisdom is not really complicated: we are expected to accept and respect all
humans as children of the one God. The Vatican attempts to preach that we
should treasure all creation while claiming that gays are “objectively
disordered.” We love you but your sexual behavior is “intrinsically evil.” What
frigid corner of the Vatican emits this spiteful verbiage?
The Second
Vatican Council tried to democratize the church. The Council fathers sought to
move the institution from domination by the hierarchy to real involvement by
the people. Their noble efforts were completely aborted. The clergy, from the
pope down, still have all the power and make all the important decisions.
The one significant
area where the laity was seriously consulted centered on the use of
contraceptives. Pope John XX111, who summoned the Vatican Council, appointed a
number of lay people as well as clerics to advise him on whether Catholics
should be allowed to use the contraceptive pill or other “unnatural methods” in
planning their families.
John’s
successor, Paul V1, expanded the numbers on this important deliberative commission.
They reported back with a strong majority favoring a liberal response to the
use of contraceptives by married couples. However, Paul decided to reject their
advice and to continue the ban on using pills or condoms.
It was a disastrous decision which most
Catholics disregarded. Paul was canonized forty years after his death mainly
for rejecting the counsel of his team of experts in favor of outmoded thinking
from the past and leading the church into an untenable situation where they
still preach that it is sinful for a married man to use a condom.
The
importance of what the people think – the sensus fidelium – is honored by
theologians, past and present. “The Spirit breathes where he will, but you know
not where he comes from or where he goes.” When we think of the myriad tales of
the sexual abuse of children, it is fair to assert that this spirit of justice
and truth did not find a receptive audience among the hierarchy. Decent people
were codded by their antics covering up awful crimes and millions walked away
in disgust.
Will the day
ever come when the power-conscious hierarchy will realize that the struggling
family, the people Christ mainly dealt with, usually have better insights into
moral issues, especially on sexual matters, than men – yes always men- whose
main claim to righteousness often consists of repeating arguments that
explicate outmoded shibboleths.
Gerry
OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com
Comments
Post a Comment