Partition in Ireland Gerry OShea
The Home
Rule Bill that was passed in Westminster in 1912 mandated a parliament in
Dublin with jurisdiction over the whole island. It was a rather weak bill but
was welcomed as an important step forward by Irish nationalists. Over 100,000
cheering supporters welcomed John Redmond, leader of the Irish Parliamentary
Party (IPP), back to Dublin after his success.
Reversing the Act of Union where Daniel
O’Connell and Charles Parnell failed was indeed a historic feat. Patrick Pearse, the leader of the Easter
rebellion a few years later, hailed it as real progress, but he issued a
prescient warning that all hell would break loose if Britain reneged on its
promises.
Meanwhile in
Belfast the Protestant community led by Edward Carson and James Craig reacted
negatively to the new bill. It specified the establishment of a unitary
government in Dublin where, as they saw it, Loyalists would be in a permanent
minority. For them, Home Rule equaled Rome Rule. So, they declared their fierce
opposition to being governed by papists who were seen as the perennial enemy of
their culture.
By 1914 when
the Home Rule Bill was finally to become law, the First World War erupted and
John Redmond agreed to postpone implementation of the bill until the war ended.
Redmond, the accepted leader of Irish nationalism, also had to face the Ulster
Question.
What could a nationalist statesman offer to a
strong rump of Protestants, predominantly living in one area of the island, who
were adamant that they would have no part of Dublin rule? Some historians
appropriately call this the “damnable question” of modern Irish history. Redmond
reluctantly concluded that he would have to accept some different arrangements
for Ulster.
The British
Government was decidedly pro-unionist. They had no intention of forcing the
issue with the Loyalists in Ulster and had little sympathy for the cause of
Irish nationalism. Any new proposal had to have the imprimatur of the Loyalist
leader, Edward Carson, who, unlike John Redmond, won establishment kudos by
serving in the cabinet during the years of the Great War.
Sinn Fein
grew stronger after the British mishandling of the aftermath of the Easter
Rising. In the 1918 Westminster election they swept the board, leaving the IPP
in the doldrums. They chose not to take their seats in Westminster and instead
set up their own provisional government.
On the same
day, January 21st 1919, that these Sinn Fein MP’s met in the Mansion House in Dublin
to choose their cabinet the War of Independence began in Tipperary, pitting the
Irish Volunteers, now generally called the Irish Republican Army (IRA), against
the various British security forces in Ireland.
The
controversy in Ulster was very much part of the revolutionary mix, but the republicans
never planned to use force to sort out that problem. Military engagement with
Protestants would involve betraying the core precept of Wolfe Tone’s inclusive
political philosophy, and they were also conscious that the Ulster Volunteers controlled
a huge militia of close to 100,000 armed men.
There were
minor IRA skirmishes against the police in Monaghan and Down, but the bulk of
the fighting in the War of Independence took place in Dublin and in the Munster
area at the other end of the island.
Economic
considerations were very much part of the discussion. Close to 70% of the Irish
GDP was generated by the linen and shipbuilding industries in Belfast and
surrounding counties. Protestant leaders pointed to these figures with great pride.
In their story, economic success reflected on their biblical lifestyle and
superior work ethic. By comparison, their Catholic neighbors were viewed as
lazy and impecunious, an attitude found also among many of their
co-religionists in Europe.
The English
and Scottish planters who took control of the land in Ireland in previous
centuries became Gaelicized over generations, more Irish than the Irish
themselves. This transformation did not happen in Ulster. Their brand of
revivalist Christianity seemed to be rooted in the hot feelings of the
religious wars of past centuries. They proudly professed their Reformation
values, stressing freedom of conscience while despising Catholic dogmatism and
subservience to the Vatican.
Most of them, Presbyterian and Methodist as
well as Anglican, came to share the colonialist attitude of the ruling English
caste who looked down on the local Irish. William Hartpole Lecky, a
distinguished Victorian historian and
Unionist politician, made this point very trenchantly in one of his books by
pointing out that the poorest down-and-out Protestant believed himself superior
to the richest Catholic.
After
completing the negotiations for the Treaty of Versailles in 1919, the British
Prime Minister, David Lloyd George, began focusing on the problems in Ireland.
The end of the Great War meant that the Home Rule Bill of 1912 had to be
enforced in accordance with the agreement with John Redmond who died a year
previously.
He realized
that the Irish situation had changed so dramatically in just a few years that
no group, nationalist or loyalist, wanted the bill implemented. He set up a
parliamentary committee under Walter Long, a strong unionist, to draw up new
proposals. No nationalists were included in his group and none was consulted or
asked for input.
Still the
Long committee recommendations were very interesting. They proposed two
parliaments for Ireland, one encompassing the nine counties of Ulster and the
other responsible for the rest of the island. In addition, they suggested a
strong Council of Ireland linking the two with twenty representatives from each
legislature. They were motivated by an effort to minimize the importance of
religion by including all the Ulster counties in the partitioning arrangement.
Unionists objected
loudly because the head count of Catholics and Protestants would be close in a
nine-county statelet, leaving them vulnerable, especially as the other side
tended to have bigger families. To mollify their fears, three counties - Cavan,
Donegal and Monaghan – were moved to the southern jurisdiction, leaving the
70,000 Protestants in those counties with a sense of abandonment as the new
lines were being drawn on the map.
The
parliamentary bill that divided the island in this way - 26 counties in the
south and six in the north - was called by an unwieldy and ironic name: “an Act
to Provide for the Better Government of Ireland.” It pleased nobody because
even Carson’s first option was for the status quo, direct rule by Westminster.
While the
Bill was making its way through parliament British forces were engaged in an
all-out war with the IRA in the South, which resulted in 1922 in an independent
government in Dublin. Sectarian violence erupted in Derry and Belfast.
Thousands of Catholic and Protestant socialist workers lost their jobs in the
shipyards and elsewhere. From the summer of 1920 until the end of 1922 close to
500 people were killed in the six counties, disproportionately Catholics in
Belfast.
The statelet was born in an atmosphere of fear
and foreboding which continued to a greater or lesser extent in Northern
Ireland until the Belfast Agreement in 1998. The new arrangements negotiated by
representatives of both communities as well as the governments in London and
Dublin were approved in referenda in both parts of the island. This agreement changes significantly the
governing and policing structures and allows for occasional plebiscites on the
constitutional issue of partition.
The division
of the country was a momentous political happening a hundred years ago. It has
lasted a century without ever gaining full legitimacy in the aggrieved Catholic
community. The division of the island is on the front burner again in recent
times as many nationalists and republicans demand a Border Poll as allowed in The
Good Friday Agreement.
That
referendum on partition is likely to take place before 2030 with uncertain
results.
Comments
Post a Comment