Random Pre-Election Ruminations Gerry OShea
We are
coming to the end of an election cycle that has engrossed the whole country.
Thousands of people waiting in line for up to ten hours just to cast a ballot
speak volumes about the high level of engagement in a leadership choice between
two white candidates well advanced in their 70’s.
It will be
over in a few weeks but, in truth, we are not sure of that because, amazingly,
the man who is well behind in nearly all the polls says that there can only be
one winner - excluding his opponent.
The
following are some random reflections on happenings since Donald Trump took
over the White House in January 2017.
Remember the
amazing Michael Avenatti. We met him first as Stormy Daniels’ lawyer,
advocating for her outside the courthouse where she sued President Trump about
hush money payments made by the president to keep their alleged affair quiet.
He became a
regular commentator on CNN where his keen mind and cogent commentary assured
him of a spot among the talking heads in the political panels opining on the
events of the day. Nobody laughed when Avenatti, definitely a celebrity at this
stage, let it out that he was eyeing a run for the White House on the
Democratic ticket.
He promised to bring President Trump and his
lawyer, Michael Cohen, down for their lies and malfeasance. He was present in
court when Cohen, abandoned by his boss, was sentenced to prison. The next man
in his sights was the guy in the White House.
He talked
confidently of his ability to win in the Iowa caucus because people were
approaching him on the street encouraging his ambition, telling him that the
Democrat field was weak and that his ability to articulate clear no-nonsense
positions would carry the day in Iowa and beyond.
The plot
thickens! Mr. Avenatti declared that the government was after him because he
was “one of the biggest threats, if not the biggest threat” to President Trump.
Then the stories started to circulate about him failing to pay taxes in
California and another case claiming that he bilked his clients’ legal settlement
accounts.
He was arrested in California for breaching
the terms of his bail and ended up in a cell in New York once occupied by El
Chapo where his lawyers claimed that the heating system was so inadequate that their
client feared he would catch pneumonia.
Avenatti asserted
he was innocent of all charges, but then in a pending suit that he brought for
a client against Nike, the huge sports outfitters, the jury decided that he was
guilty of extortion which carries a long jail sentence. Prior to the trial, he
was bloviating about collecting millions from that case where at one time he
boasted of Nike losing billions if they didn’t play nice with him.
Meanwhile, he was unable to pay his rent or
meet his payroll and Stormy Daniels claimed that he was refusing to part with
$300,000 she was paid as an advance on a tell-all book.
Michael is a
well-educated man with a knowledge of Greek mythology. Before the Nike case
went to court he compared himself to the winged Icarus who disregarded his
father Daedalus’ advice and flew too close to the sun which melted the wax in
his wings resulting in him plunging to his death – a classic warning of inevitable
disaster when human beings driven by an overvaulting ego disregard their
limitations and end up in a dark and lonely place.
Christian
theologians agree with the moral message of the Icarus story because they are
unanimous in preaching that unchecked hubris is mankind’s most corrupting and
soul-destroying sin. Avenatti saw the imminent danger in setting aside
Daedalus’ sage counsel to his son, but he still disregarded it and flew too
close to the sun with predictable consequences.
In prison,
he will have plenty time to read Shakespeare’s tragedies which deal with powerful
characters overstretching to enhance their power and prestige. In one of those
tragedies, Macbeth, lines towards the end of the play will certainly
resonate with him where Macbeth is feeling a sense of desolation and
abandonment as he reflects on the collapse of his own egregious plans: Life
is but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the
stage and then is heard no more.
If Michael
Avenatti was the ultimate chancer with an eye only for his own aggrandizement,
Pete Buttigieg emerged on the national stage around the same time representing
very different values. Born in 1982, he graduated from Harvard and then Oxford
before being elected Mayor of South Bend, Indiana in November, 2011 and
re-elected four years later.
He joined
the Navy reserves and spent seven months away from his mayor’s job serving in
Afghanistan where he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant. Emblematic of his
inquisitiveness about other cultures, he learned how to speak Dari, a Persian
dialect, used by many of the local Afghans.
Very few
outside of his state knew of him when he joined the dozen or so aspiring
candidates for the Democrat nomination, most of whom served in the House of
Representatives or the Senate. He made a strong impression as a well-prepared
bright debater. He also came across as personable and he is a fine public
speaker.
His
candidacy attracted attention not only because of his sure-footed answers to
political questions but because he is an openly-gay man, married to Chasten
Glezman, a local teacher, who travelled with him to many of his political
engagements, and they left no doubt about their love for and commitment to each
other. He was the first gay man to seek the nomination of a major party in
America.
Democratic
voters warmed to Mayor Pete and he won the Iowa caucus, edging out no less a
celebrity opponent than Senator Bernie Sanders. He also tied for first place in
New Hampshire, but Joe Biden got such a tremendous boost in South Carolina and
subsequent contests that Pete conceded in March of this year and immediately
endorsed the former vice-president.
President
Obama, in a recent interview, pointed to Mayor Pete as someone with the
intelligence and commitment to assume a major leadership role in the Democratic
Party. It will be surprising if Joe Biden doesn’t call on him for a senior
position if, of course, he wins the election.
Back to
President Trump. In the campaign, he has continued his degrading rhetoric about
locking up his opponents. Four years ago he cheered on despicable “lock-her-up”
chants directed against Hillary Clinton. Recently, he turned on the Biden
family, accusing them of being part of a criminal enterprise and stating that
the former vice-president should be in jail. At a recent rally in an exuberant
mood he shouted “lock them all up.”
This kind of
loutish talk, way beyond acceptable decorum, has never before been used in a
presidential election.
Keep in mind
that Donald Trump is being seriously scrutinized by the legal authorities for
allegedly lying on his tax returns and other matters relating to his
relationship with Stormy Daniels. There are also some allegations of assault by
a few females, at least one of which is likely to end up before a judge.
Consider Joe
Biden in the White House in January with a new attorney general behaving
independently in a post-Barr era. Will they want to intervene in any way to
protect this former president, considering his untoward behavior and bombastic
rhetoric in two presidential campaigns?
Michael
Cohen has served time for engaging in illegal activity that he says – with a
copy of Trump’s check in his hand – was ordered by his boss. All of this will
be up for scrutiny by a New York jury.
Nobody is
above the law. The chickens may well come home to roost. A decision against him could provide the
greatest irony of the decade where the “lock-them-up” president is himself
sentenced to serve time in prison.
Comments
Post a Comment