It's the Economy Stupid Gerry OShea
"It's the economy stupid" is remembered as the
succinct message James Carville conveyed
to the Democratic Party workers during
Bill Clinton's first campaign for the presidency in 1992. He felt that the
campaign was wasting too much time focusing on esoteric issues of foreign and
domestic policy.
Instead, he wanted those knocking on doors and indeed the
wider national campaign to engage people on kitchen- table issues - jobs,
salaries, taxes, education and healthcare. He stressed that these are the real
challenges that impact people every day.
Carville was certainly not the first to appreciate this
approach to a political campaign. When Jimmy Carter ran against the incumbent
president, Gerald Ford, in 1976, he highlighted what he called the misery index
which he claimed reflected poorly on his opponent. He explained that this
measure of progress is derived by adding the unemployment rate to the
national inflation figure, and Carter said that Ford had to answer for a
rather forbidding combined misery number of close to 13%.
Historians of that period claim that the Democratic emphasis on this negative statistic played an
important part in Carter's narrow victory. Ironically, four years later in 1980
Ronald Reagan, the Republican candidate, challenged people to use the same
index in judging the Carter years. He asked whether people were better off after a few years of a Democrat in charge in
the White House - and, of course, Reagan won a tight election.
This stress on economic matters augurs well for President
Trump as we face into the 2020 presidential race for the White House. The
unemployment rate is very low and inflation has not surfaced as a problem.
Mortgage rates , a major consideration for many families, have rarely ever been
as favorable for borrowers and small family businesses can access finance relatively easily.
Finally, about 20% of Americans - approximately 50 million
people - own stocks, mostly vested in 401ks, and the stock market is booming.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average has climbed over 20% so far in 2019. The beneficiaries of the good times in Wall
Street come mainly from the economic elite in society and tend to vote in high
numbers. There is no doubt that when
they get their quarterly financial
reports many see the substantial increase in their investments as proof that
Trump is doing a fine job.
With all this positive economic news, how come that the President's
approval rating as revealed in nearly
all national polls rarely passes 45% and indeed mostly registers below that?
For some people the economy is indeed vibrant, but many in
the middle class don't see any benefits for themselves or their families.
Trump's budgets have delivered large financial bonuses to millionaires and
others at the top of the earnings curve, but a promised improvement in the
take-home pay of shop floor workers has not materialized.
Conservative leaders
promised that directing the bulk of the tax breaks to the rich and big
corporations would result in a major economic stimulus with the benefits
leading to a surge in business investments and the additional cash trickling
down to all Americans. They further assured voters that the cost of the big
giveaway to the rich would pay for itself by generating enhanced economic
activity, leading to more money flowing to the IRS. In reality, true to the
negative history of the debunked trickle-down theory of economics, the national
deficit has increased by a massive 1.4
trillion dollars, a bill that will have to be paid by future generations.
Affordable healthcare remains an important consideration for
every family. Both parties agree that it was a major issue in the mid-term
elections in November 2018 when Republicans were trounced and healthcare was
identified as the gorilla policy issue impacting the results.
Donald Trump and the Republican leadership almost succeeded
in dismantling the Affordable Care Act(ACA), better known as Obamacare, without
any replacement proposal. However the ACA brought approximately twenty million
people into health coverage and, very significantly for many families, it barred insurance companies from refusing
to include pre-existing medical
condition in their policies.
Obamacare is now popular and still the law of the land. All
the Democratic candidates for the
presidency have promised that they will expand the ACA coverage or indeed
replace it with a more radical proposal, a single-payer, medicare-for-all
universal mandate. By comparison, Mr.
Trump promises to announce a new policy when he is re-elected. It is hard to
believe that Republican candidates for the House and the Senate will not even have
a policy proposal to offer the
electorate in this crucial economic area.
The healthcare debate favors Democrats and this will be a
pivotal, dinner-table issue again when voters go to the polls next November.
Pro-life voters, people who want the Roe v Wade decision
overturned, will rarely cast a ballot for a Democratic candidate who,
assuredly, will argue for maintaining the present law and thus affirming a woman's right to choose. Pro-lifers will not
be guided by economic issues and can be relied on to cast their ballots for
Republicans and they will provide an important boost for the President.
Most evangelicals are seemingly not influenced by the
quality of a candidate's character. One would think that a thrice-married
philanderer who has told thousands of lies since he won the White House would
point them in a different direction. Not so! They see the liberal establishment
as the enemy of their agenda, and the vast majority will continue to vote
Republican, irrespective of monetary considerations - another significant
voting bloc for Mr. Trump.
On the other side, the support of Black voters from all
economic backgrounds remains a safe bet for the Democratic Party. This will
certainly not change in 2020 as most African-Americans see the current
president as a racist.
Global warming may not yet be a kitchen table concern but it
could be a decisive issue in the November 2020 election. President Trump,
against all the scientific evidence of impending weather disasters in sea and
land, has pronounced the claims of major weather disasters ahead as bogus, and
he has withdrawn the United States from the international Paris Climate Accord.
For the first time in a presidential election, this issue is generating major concerns, especially among young voters,
and it is likely to boost Democrats who certainly do highlight the dire
warnings of serious societal disruptions because of the world's continuing dependence on fossil-fuels.
Back to Bill Clinton's strategy guru James Carville and his
election wisdom. His dictum about the pre-eminence of economic issues retains
credibility but perhaps a little less in these times of torrid emotions about
impeachment and doomsday climate threats
.
Comments
Post a Comment