Skip to main content

Home Rule: A Mighty Day in Dublin

 

                Home Rule: A Mighty Day in Dublin     Gerry OShea

Two general elections were held in Great Britain in 1910, which yielded roughly the same results. The two main parties, the Liberals and the Conservatives, ended up with similar numbers of seats in parliament, giving John Redmond, leader of the 82 Irish MPs, the balance of power in Westminster.

The Irish contingent supported the Liberal leader Herbert Asquith, who promised to introduce an Irish Home Rule bill that would give Ireland a measure of independence that the two great Irish leaders of the 19th century, Daniel O’Connell and Charles Parnell, had failed to achieve.

Sunday, March 31,1912, was a momentous day in Dublin. Up to 150,000 people from all parts of the island gathered to celebrate the introduction of an Irish Home Rule Bill in Westminster, surely guaranteeing the achievement of the long-sought goal: the restoration of a parliament in Dublin, achieved without resorting to guns or bombs.

For the first time since the Act of Union in 1801, when what was known as Grattan’s Parliament was prorogued and London assumed direct control of Irish affairs, Asquith’s bill gave Dublin its own parliament again. The words of the great Thomas Davis song were proclaimed as a victory statement among the ebullient multitude. Finally, Ireland would become “A Nation Once Again.”

Four speakers’ platforms were erected on Sackville Street, the official name of what Dubliners even then called O’Connell Street. Each was decked out with a canvas backdrop displaying the appropriate message, true to the nationalist motif, “Ireland a Nation.”

The wooden erection at the south end of the street was called the students’ platform. There, the loudest cheers were heard for Michael Davitt, son of the late great Land League campaigner and socialist of the same name from County Mayo.

In another dais near the Father Matthew statue, John Dillon, the veteran Dublin MP, was the premier orator, while his parliamentary colleague from Belfast, Joe Devlin, occupied the speakers’ rostrum erected on the corner of Middle Abbey Street.

 Speaking next to Mr. Devlin was Patrick Pearse, a high school principal and a leader of the growing number of cultural nationalists, who welcomed the development of a parliament in Dublin as a first step towards complete liberation. True to his Fenian beliefs, he suspected that the English might again fail to deliver on their promise and ominously warned that “if we are cheated once more, there will be red war in Ireland.”

Pearse knew that a clear majority in the ruling Establishment in London did not want to cede power from what they called the mother of parliaments to a local assembly in Dublin. This would represent a major defeat for English colonialism, which fostered the idea that all political control emanated from Westminster, the guiding power center of the British Empire.

Bonar Law, leader of the conservative Tory party, made his opposition clear in a widely reported speech about the future of democracy and the union in the Empire: “There are things stronger than parliamentary majorities,” he warned. One commentator, with good reason, accused him of “flirting with sedition.”

Pearse also knew of the depth of opposition to Dublin Home Rule by Ulster Unionists. In fact, he had, rather unwisely, praised them for their obstinate refusal to assent to any version of the government bill. He liked and lauded their defiance of the Westminster rulers.

The largest crowd gathered early around the number one platform located close to the recently completed Parnell monument at the northern end of the street. This statue was erected under the leadership of John Redmond, a parliamentary protégé of Charles Parnell, who wanted to honor the legacy of his distinguished predecessor despite his humiliating fall from grace and premature death. This was the assigned leader’s location for Mr. Redmond’s highly anticipated oration.

At 1.50pm Redmond and his wife, Amy, left the Mansion House after lunch with the Lord Mayor, Lorcan Sherlock, to move to O’Connell Street led by no less than 170 pipers’ and brass bands. Loud and prolonged cheers greeted them as they approached the Parnell platform.

This was the high point of the nationalist day of celebration, and appropriately, it began with a rousing rendering of the national anthem: “And Ireland, long a province, be A Nation Once Again.” All together now, the great Thomas Davis’ powerful demand, “A Nation Once Again!”

John Redmond, a fine public speaker, compares this gathering to Daniel O’Connell’s legendary monster meetings, assuring his audience that “it is no exaggeration to say that this meeting is Ireland.” Great words for the exuberant crowd, but he knows that a significant part of the Irish population is not represented in Dublin, and they are fiercely determined to scupper Home Rule.

A few months before the Dublin celebratory jamboree, over 100,000 marchers listened in Craigavon, near Belfast, to Sir Edward Carson define the Home Rule Bill as “the most nefarious conspiracy ever hatched against a free people.”

The division on the island was along religious lines, with Catholics waving the green nationalist flag and Protestants showing the Union Jack on the opposing side, claiming that in their powerful trope “Home Rule will be Rome rule.” Ironically, some of the top 19th-century nationalist leaders, including Parnell and Davis, came from strong Protestant backgrounds.

The unionists in the North decided that if Westminster passed Home Rule, they would demand similar treatment for Ulster and insist on their own parliament. Redmond rejected this approach: “Ireland is a unit. The Two Nations theory is to us nationalists an abomination and a blasphemy.”

One nation or two on the island, that debate still goes on after a hundred and twenty years. Dealing with this conundrum formed a central part of the admirable Good Friday Agreement, where both states, with headquarters in Dublin and Belfast, agreed in separate referenda that the constitutional change needed for unity cannot happen until it is approved in separate plebiscites by the people in the North and the South.

Gerry OShea blogs at wemustbetalking.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theological Considerations

  Theological Considerations                Gerry OShea In a pre-Christmas address to a gathering of theologians at the Vatican, Pope Francis spoke about the importance of their educational role in exploring the complex relationships between God and his creation. He urged the assembled scholars to steer clear of esoteric ruminations and concentrate on making their findings accessible to all. He used the metaphor of light to illustrate how theology functions in the world, pointing out that it makes things appear without showing itself. “It works quietly and humbly so that the light of the Gospel can emerge.” Francis also stressed the need for more women theologians, proclaiming that, “There are things that only women understand, and theology needs their contribution. An all-male theology is an incomplete theology. We still have a long way to go in this direction.” The place of women in the Catholic Church presents t...

Some Moral Perspectives on American Life

  Moral Perspectives in America      Gerry OShea The clear division between the traditionalists and progressives in the American Catholic Church has become more glaring during the last few decades. A more free-thinking membership has largely supplanted the old-time religion involving weekly attendance at mass and regular confession of sins to a priest. In my Yonkers neighborhood stretching along McLean Avenue from Broadway on the west to Bronx River Rd., which is still populated by large numbers of emigrants from Ireland, three Catholic schools have been closed in the last few years, and the number of people attending weekly mass has dropped dramatically from just a generation ago. A 2022 Pew Research Center survey highlights a major difference between Catholics identifying themselves as supporters of the Republican and Democratic parties. 82% of Catholics who are Democrats feel that global climate change presents a serious moral problem, while among Repub...

Revival of the Irish Language

  The Revival of the Irish Language           Gerry OShea A central tenet of colonialism highlights the superiority of the ruling power in all facets of cultural expression. So, in 19th-century Ireland, the British overlords stressed in their words and attitude that their system of government, their literature, their games, their religion, and, of course, their language were far ahead of anything practiced locally. The Gaelic Revival, which included the foundation of the Gaelic Athletic Association and the emergence of outstanding Anglo-Irish writers like William Butler Yeats and John Millington Synge rejected these foreign suppositions of Irish inferiority.   The Gaelic League, founded in 1893 with Douglas Hyde, son of a Protestant rector from county Roscommon as president, focused on promoting the study and use of the Irish language. They got a positive reception in all parts of the island because the second half of the 19 t...