Skip to main content

Just Imagine



Just Imagine!           Gerry O'Shea


Join me in a trip to la-la land. Dream with me that instead of the Electoral College our president is elected by popular vote and Hillary Clinton is in the White House.


Imagine what the Republican leaders would be saying if she was complaining  every day about the media, dubbing it the enemy of the people, a mischievous trope suggesting that CNN and reputable newspapers like the New York Times are trying to thwart the wishes of the majority of the people. Would these Republican leaders allow her to assert her innocence of any culpability when one of her extremist followers sends a pipe bomb to the offices of CNN?


Think for a moment of the loud guffaws from Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham if any Democratic president stated publicly that she "fell  in love" with the North Korean tyrant Kim Jong Un, boasting that Kim had written her "a beautiful letter." Just imagine the condemnatory rhetoric such language would elicit especially among right-wingers in Washington.


Consider the reaction among Republicans if the Washington Post  documented over four hundred lies by a President Clinton - a daily barrage of untruths and exaggerations where every achievement, real or imaginary, is the greatest or the biggest ever. Imagine if a Democratic president pronounced in her own defense "I always tell the truth - when I can!"


President Trump claimed recently that 52% of women voted for him in November 2016 when the actual percentage was 41%. Think of the opposition response if Hillary was off 11% on such a basic statistic. Similarly, the president claimed that only 3% of illegal immigrants show up for a scheduled court appearance. Official records reveal that the figure is closer to 70%. Would we see a red-faced Mitch McConnell ask her if she had any shame or any pride in her role as the leader of the free world?


Imagine if a Democratic president refused to provide reams of relevant material to the Senate Judiciary Committee about a supreme court nominee by asserting that she already gave a lot of other documentation which she deemed sufficient. Would Chuck Grassley and company just refuse to be part of such an obvious charade?


How would Ted Cruz or other long-serving members of the Armed Services Committee or Rand Paul in the Foreign Relations Committee react if a President Clinton identified as terrorists a group of poor people from El Salvador and Honduras walking over a thousand miles to achieve some modicum of opportunity for themselves and their families, away from their troubled countries?


 How would these Republican leaders react to the President's declaration, without the slightest regard for truth, that she had to summon 15000 troops to confront and overcome these bad people? Think how Hillary would be lambasted for her inhumanity, for playing the old sordid blame-the-foreigner tune.


Just imagine if in response to the recent dire warning from the United Nations about impending ecological disasters without major policy changes away from solid fuel and other harmful pollutants, a President Clinton rejected the overwhelming scientific evidence and dubbed the ecological crisis a hoax while instructing her government to ease off on laws and protocols that protect the environment. Would the Republicans go along with this Neanderthal thinking?


Think about the hostile reaction from the dormant Republican intelligentsia if HIllary in the White House said the 14th amendment to the constitution, which plainly grants citizenship to anyone born in the United States, could be amended by executive order - just on her say-so! The outcry from the Right would be heard in Kansas!


William F Buckley, considered by many the father of modern conservatism, warned that deficit spending could never be allowed because  he argued very cogently that, except in the case of all-out war, passing on debt to future generations conflicts with sound moral reasoning and plain fairness. Indeed, some Republican leaders were so opposed to a few of President Obama's budgets that they threatened to close the government down rather than yield on this sacred principle.


 Imagine how they would treat President Clinton if she dared to introduce a budget that breached this unmovable belief in fiscal rectitude by more than a trillion dollars. Just imagine the disgust among the Republican leaders about dramatically increasing the deficit, the bill that future generations will have to pay.


Back from la-la land. Hillary is in Chappaqua with her family, and the man in the White House is still shamelessly leading crowds in Lock Her Up chants.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theological Considerations

  Theological Considerations                Gerry OShea In a pre-Christmas address to a gathering of theologians at the Vatican, Pope Francis spoke about the importance of their educational role in exploring the complex relationships between God and his creation. He urged the assembled scholars to steer clear of esoteric ruminations and concentrate on making their findings accessible to all. He used the metaphor of light to illustrate how theology functions in the world, pointing out that it makes things appear without showing itself. “It works quietly and humbly so that the light of the Gospel can emerge.” Francis also stressed the need for more women theologians, proclaiming that, “There are things that only women understand, and theology needs their contribution. An all-male theology is an incomplete theology. We still have a long way to go in this direction.” The place of women in the Catholic Church presents t...

Some Moral Perspectives on American Life

  Moral Perspectives in America      Gerry OShea The clear division between the traditionalists and progressives in the American Catholic Church has become more glaring during the last few decades. A more free-thinking membership has largely supplanted the old-time religion involving weekly attendance at mass and regular confession of sins to a priest. In my Yonkers neighborhood stretching along McLean Avenue from Broadway on the west to Bronx River Rd., which is still populated by large numbers of emigrants from Ireland, three Catholic schools have been closed in the last few years, and the number of people attending weekly mass has dropped dramatically from just a generation ago. A 2022 Pew Research Center survey highlights a major difference between Catholics identifying themselves as supporters of the Republican and Democratic parties. 82% of Catholics who are Democrats feel that global climate change presents a serious moral problem, while among Repub...

Revival of the Irish Language

  The Revival of the Irish Language           Gerry OShea A central tenet of colonialism highlights the superiority of the ruling power in all facets of cultural expression. So, in 19th-century Ireland, the British overlords stressed in their words and attitude that their system of government, their literature, their games, their religion, and, of course, their language were far ahead of anything practiced locally. The Gaelic Revival, which included the foundation of the Gaelic Athletic Association and the emergence of outstanding Anglo-Irish writers like William Butler Yeats and John Millington Synge rejected these foreign suppositions of Irish inferiority.   The Gaelic League, founded in 1893 with Douglas Hyde, son of a Protestant rector from county Roscommon as president, focused on promoting the study and use of the Irish language. They got a positive reception in all parts of the island because the second half of the 19 t...